I was 11 years old when this documentary series aired in
1972. I never even heard of it until
today, when I ran across a mention of it from a fellow student posting at the
OCA forums. For those that might want
some background, have a look here. Much
of what Berger discusses doesn't seem particularly new, though it may have been
when the series was produced. Still, he
makes valuable points about how we view art.
Perhaps his most fundamental assumption is that images are like words,
which can be used in different ways to elicit different feelings or
behaviors. Advertisers and promoters are
widely aware of this. (See Adam Curtis'
documentaries for more powerful evidence of this.) Consumers typically are not, and Berger's
ambition with this project seems to be raising awareness, in particular with
regards to what he sees as the pseudo religious air surrounding high art. He performs a number of interesting
experiments, including juxtaposing clips of a painting with clips of dancing
girls and a firing squad execution to illustrate how context shapes
meaning. He finishes the first episode
with a reading from an art critic whose work seems to be struggling to justify
itself, followed by a visit with school children who respond without
affectation. I think Berger would agree
with Suzuki: In beginner's mind we have many possibilities, but in expert mind
there is not much possibility.
Episodes 2 and 3 deal respectively with The Nude and The Oil Painting, one a subject, the other a medium. Both, Berger says, functioned as objects of ownership and reflected back at owners their status as property holders.
#
Episodes 2 and 3 deal respectively with The Nude and The Oil Painting, one a subject, the other a medium. Both, Berger says, functioned as objects of ownership and reflected back at owners their status as property holders.
In Episode 4 Berger observes that where the oil painting was
nearly documentary, modern commercial photography has no such pretensions. Its purpose is to convince you that your life
will be better for having spent your money on the advertised product. It seeks to entice, seduce, and incite. He
goes on to "read" a magazine, flipping back and forth between images
of starving South Asians and the colorful, glamorous models in the adverts,
demonstrating the radical disharmony between reality and publicity. Despite huge changes in technology and information
delivery, it seems we are still quite able, in fact probably better able, to
blithely dismiss what are otherwise rude disjunctures in experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment